I've encountered 3 KA hackers since the launch of GWEN, and I've seen GWEN ban 3 KA hackers since launch.

Aug 24, 16 · +2 · Like · Report

Mixed. I feel like Gwen is doing great, but that some members of the staff team are putting way to much faith in it. One I saw called Gwen "perfect", which it isn't. It's still an experimental program that has bugs, and only bans the most obvious hackers. But that being said, I am pleased by it so far. A lot more then I expected out of it. My hopes are high for it.

Aug 24, 16 · +2 · Like · Report

Hyrawr

Oh yeah. They shouldn't be calling it perfect since Sigils (I speak like he's some sort of heavenly body at this point) himself has stated it will not be perfect. It's a good thing that it's doing well, though.

Aug 24, 16 · +1 · Like · Report

---

u r corrupt for laughing at innocent players!1111!!!!11

Aug 24, 16 · +2 · Like · Report

Hyrawr

Aug 27, 16 · +1 · Like · Report

Nazo formerly

I caNt say for 100% since im still unable to test it ingame, but it seems to be doing good thus far. Though it annoys me to no end when staff say that all the false bans thus far have been proven to be not false, which is about as likely as someone winning the lottery twice in a row. There are always going to be false bans, no matter what, especially on initial release when the anticheat is still a bit experimental. Regardless though, it seems to be doing good so far, and i think only letting it ban for obvious hacks at first to minimize false bans and fine tune the harder to detect stuff was a good move

Aug 24, 16 · +0 · Like · Report

Hyrawr

Well that's good!

Aug 27, 16 · +1 · Like · Report