BAD

IDEA

DIFFERENT GAMES HAVE DIFFERENT PLAYER COUNTS
0 comments
its no good
0 comments
Do they mean rotation by like the mixed arcade rotation? There's no way I'm going to stick around for an hour to play one of the removed games or whatever in a rotation. I didn't see any problems with the number of npc's in the lobby, besides maybe lag (idk if it even really affected lag that bad), and i would prefer to have lots of npc's in the lobby over not being able to play castle siege or another game they removed. (besides its not like lag is that much of an issue in the lobby its not like they are playing an actual game) This whole "decluttering" thing sounds like they are just trying to put the most popular games in the forefront, and that they are indeed assuming that different games are superior over others. That's the only way to explain not having npc's for every game, or shoving every game into the same rotation. why couldn't that make multiple rows of npc's in the front? it would still look "decluttered" like they were going for. Do they really think that this rotation idea will actually satisfy players whose favorite games were removed? REALLY? (Also tbh the old Mineplex lobby with lots of things all close together was rather nice and cozy feeling.)
0 comments
they could have just said “we’re going to stop updating this game” and not remove anything lol
1 comments
ole
m o n e y
instead of trying to making things harder than they should be Mineplex should just revert the whole update lmao
1 comments
ole
m o n e y
yo i just want to play DE, OITQ, and GLD for fun and not have to worry about this
0 comments
yo i just want to play DE, OITQ, and GLD for fun and not have to worry about this
0 comments