Ohhhh, most definitely! I try to be most of the time lady-like ...but... there are those who f’ing piss you off, and all hell ... more like what the hell!
Well Cruiser ... can’t you count? You stated 4 comment, so if 1 is you being the fuck-ee then 2 is who will be the fuck-er... not? Just the point of your math is off... prove me wrong! lol
Hardly, the initial post is *quite* ambiguous! See, simply saying "f**k you" naturally invites the question of "with what?", which naturally can also be extended to "by whom". You really shouldn't assume such a single-dimensional meaning to such things, and should get clarification where possible! After all, you wouldn't want to make a *mistake*, and neither would I!
Also, your math is ambiguous. Where did you get your one and two, or your four? What about three, or pi? And you don't seem to have calculated in the finite improbability of fuckage factor multiplied by the inverse square of fuckages available, nor did you remove it from the average of fuckages per capita minus currently occupied/in-use fuckages divided by the (inverse of the attractiveness score multiplied by the compatibility score). Properly done, you should arrive at a standardized fuckage curve per unit capita for a given subject; however, the slope of the fuckage curve while multiplied by time also is acted on by (1/time) lowering the growth rate of the standardized fuckage curve to account for aging.
It also must be noted that a standardized fuckage curve is woefully insufficient for calculating fuckage per unit wealth; Zuckerberg, for example, has a fuckage curve of .01^(1/t0) due to dismal personality, questionable morals/ethics, and limited social ability without (fuckage*wealth) accounted for; his actual fuckage curve has actually landed him closer to 55 for hetero-fuckage enhanced factoring, unknown for others due to data limits.
Ugh, too tired for this... Work and admin stuff tomorrow!
May 29, 18 · +2 · Like · Report